Stop Running a Pipeline, Start Building an Engine: 4 Unconventional GTM Plays That Actually Work
Introduction: The Architect vs. The Operator
What separates someone who just runs a pipeline from someone who engineers a revenue machine?
The core difference isn't effort, but design. It's a fundamental mindset shift from simply executing tasks to architecting systems that generate results.
This article distills four surprising but highly impactful takeaways from a deep dive into real-world GTM execution notes, revealing how top performers think, act, and build.
Takeaway 1: Ditch the Sales Pitch and Become the "Mad Scientist"
In a technical sale, demonstrating capability is infinitely more powerful than talking about it. The most effective approach is often not to sell, but to solve a small part of the problem live, proving you understand the customer's world on a fundamental level.
The Live Demo That Changed Everything
During one interview, the prospect revealed an acute business pain: they were about to be hit with thousands of leads from a major event and were "drowning in potential data" with no system to process it.
The key to success wasn't a polished slide deck, but a simple Python script. By showing the code and speaking the language of "deterministic and non-deterministic agents," the conversation shifted.
The script wasn't just a cool demo; it was a direct, tangible cure for their biggest immediate problem. The prospect wasn't looking for a traditional salesperson; they were looking for an experimenter.
"We need a Mad Scientist who can run experiments and get signal."
This persona is powerful because it reframes the GTM role from a vendor pushing a product to a GTM Engineer diagnosing a system failure and presenting the cure on the spot. It builds immediate credibility and aligns you with the technical and strategic goals of the organization, not just their procurement process.
Key Insight
In technical sales, showing beats telling. A live demo of your actual work builds more credibility than any slide deck. The "Mad Scientist" persona positions you as a problem-solver, not just a salesperson.
Takeaway 2: Turn One-Off Wins Into a Repeatable Machine
Individual creativity and "heroic" efforts can win a deal, but they can't scale a business. The most valuable GTM professionals follow a simple but powerful framework:
The Systemization Framework
Experiment → Measure → Systemize → Scale
They treat every success not as a final destination, but as the prototype for a repeatable process.
The Reddit Air Strike: From Experiment to Engine
The "Reddit Air Strike" play is a perfect example. It began as a "secret shopper" experiment to gather competitive intelligence and successfully generated three high-value, problem-aware leads.
An operator sees three leads and logs them in the CRM.
An architect sees a prototype for a lead-generation asset.
The play was immediately systemized with tailored scripts and then delegated to the SDR team for ongoing execution.
This approach transforms a single person's clever idea into a scalable, organizational asset. It creates a GTM engine that doesn't rely on one person's heroics but on a library of proven, repeatable plays that anyone on the team can run.
Real Result
The Reddit Air Strike started as a one-off experiment. After systemization, it became a repeatable play generating consistent leads per week and contributing to a significant pipeline.
Takeaway 3: Weaponize Your Follow-Up
A simple "Thanks for the meeting" email is a massive wasted opportunity. Every touchpoint is a chance to add value, demonstrate expertise, and advance the conversation. A strategic follow-up can be the single most powerful move you make in a sales cycle.
The 30-60-90 Day Plan Follow-Up
Consider a post-interview follow-up. The prospect asked for a 30-60-90 day plan. Instead of a simple thank-you note with a few bullet points, the response was a fully architected, one-page PDF titled "GTM Architecture (Q1)."
It wasn't just a plan; it was a blueprint for immediate value creation, broken into three phases with clear business outcomes:
- The Signal Engine: Ingest thousands of leads, run them through an enrichment script, and identify the 'Top 100' high-intent targets for the CEO/Seller.
- The Content Loop: Convert static PDF guides into interactive assets like a "Vendor Risk Calculator" to increase the download-to-demo conversion rate.
- The Watering Holes: Execute a targeted in-person dinner strategy for in-person validation of the core narrative with finance leaders.
This approach is profoundly effective. It demonstrates that you were listening intently, that you are a proactive problem-solver, and it immediately shifts the conversation from "are you qualified?" to "how will you solve our problem?".
Key Insight
The best follow-up isn't a question—it's a resource. Send something valuable that positions you as an advisor, not a vendor. Turn every touchpoint into a strategic asset.
Takeaway 4: Treat Stalled Deals as a Design Problem
When a deal stalls, the default move is the "just checking in" email—a low-value tactic that often does more harm than good. Instead, top performers treat a stalled deal as a design problem, requiring a "Value-Add Pivot." This isn't a single tactic, but a flexible strategy for reviving momentum.
The Value-Add Pivot
When the Proof of Concept (POC) was pushed out, the deal was at high risk of going dark. Instead of a generic check-in, a strategic evaluation checklist was sent.
This simple document executed three deliberate moves:
- It seized control of the narrative by framing their evaluation process around our key strengths.
- It maintained momentum with a value-add asset, preventing the deal from going dark.
- It secured the next step by locking in a commitment for a future re-engagement.
The C-Level Leverage Strategy
This strategy can take other forms. When a deal stalled, the pivot was a targeted follow-up to the champion reminding them of a pre-release briefing with the CEO.
This leveraged C-level sponsorship and powerful third-party validation to regain momentum.
In both cases, the Value-Add Pivot repositions you from a salesperson chasing a signature to a strategic advisor helping the customer navigate their own process.
Key Insight
When a deal stalls, don't just ask for an update—give them a tool that makes their job easier and subtly guides them back to you. Treat every obstacle as a design challenge, not a dead end.
Conclusion: Build the Machine
The common thread uniting these four takeaways is a shift in identity. The most effective GTM professionals are not just operators running a process; they are architects who design, build, and optimize revenue systems.
They turn one-off experiments into scalable plays, transform mundane follow-ups into strategic assets, and treat every obstacle as a design challenge.
It's a philosophy captured perfectly by the hero section title from the author's personal website:
"I Build Revenue Systems That Replace Headcount."
It's about creating leverage through systems, not just effort.
The Question
As you reflect on your own process, ask yourself this: What is one task you operate today that you could start architecting into a system tomorrow?
Want to Build Your Own GTM Engine?
I've built systems that replaced 10 SDRs ($424K savings) and grew pipeline 160%. If you're building GTM systems, let's connect.